Love Lied to Me Again Sam Kinison I Wouldnt Lie to You Ten Times in a Row
Sub-Par
"Caddyshack Two" tries to continue the comedy of the beginning, but never does actually come up together the mode it was intended to. Chevy Chase is the only returner from the original and this hurts the motion picture. Jackie Bricklayer, Robert Stack, Jonathan Silverman, Dyan Cannon, Randy Quaid, and Dan Aykroyd do their best, simply the fabric is just not nowadays. The direction is also poor every bit few viewers will really care what happens by the stop of the movie. 2 stars out of 5.
24 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Utterly dreadful
Every time I spotter this movie blood comes gushing out of my optics. Yeah, you read that correctly: I've watched this wretched, foul matter more than once.
Caddyshack two went wrong for and then many reasons: Harold Ramis dialing in a script and abandoning the direction duties, Rodney Dangerfield (wisely) walking away from the projection because they wouldn't allow him to tinker with the script, Bill Murray showing first-class sentence and not being role of it, and a puppet being pushed forward as the characteristic player of a cast who deserved much better.
I can't assist simply call up of Dyan Cannon in this and wonder why she's perpetually laughing and grinning. The only conclusion I can draw is that she is indeed the face of pure evil. Stay with me a moment. She must have been watching as the film came together and revelled in the untold agony that information technology would inflict on endless soon to exist extremely pitiful moving-picture show goers who would take this film inflicted on them. She may also have been extremely drunk. That'southward what I demand to be correct at present to wash the foul taste of this complete and utter failure out of my mind. If I'm lucky it'll exist washed out forever.
I have seen this film several times. I blame several of them on childhood and being a very irksome and dim-witted male child who apparently had no aesthetic sensibility. Peradventure puppets are just funnier when you're a kid. No, the Muppet testify is funnier now ... guess I was just dull. Caddyshack ii is that rare kind of film that is so extraordinarily disappointing on and then many levels that you convince yourself after the end credits that information technology couldn't have been equally bad as all that. It WAS. Information technology IS. It will only get worse with time.
My reasons for going back to this motion-picture show, mercifully, are becoming fewer. Randy Quaid is express in his part equally Jackie Mason's lawyer. His opening scene isn't bad and brought out my just chuckle. We see him a few more times just it becomes as tired as the residue of the movie and descends with unfortunate rapidity from incidentally amusing to vapid wasteland. Randy Quaid acquits himself well, and this pic owes him big time because if there was reason to watch this film as anything other than a torture tactic, he was it.
Maybe that's the fox of the moving-picture show. It has enough potentially endearing qualities that people watch it, are horrified at what they've done to themselves but afterwards because the pickings were and so slim can remember simply what did actually amuse them. Years later they unwittingly watch it again and the cycle repeats.
Jackie Mason takes a lot of the blame for this movie but in fairness, I'm not certain he deserves information technology. He'southward actually trying out there but it is impossible to non to notice that he spends the entire movie doing a Rodney Dangerfield impersonation. That's who the moving-picture show was written for but I'm non sure even he could accept saved it. Ultimately this fails miserably through terrible direction, bad editing (shall nosotros count continuity errors?) and a rehashing of the same story with none of the wry humour or centre that fabricated the first flick endearing.
Dragged kicking and screaming upward to a three out of ten instead of 2 by Randy Quaid's bulldog conclusion. Information technology isn't even bad enough to express joy at. I've definitely seen worse, simply trust your retentiveness -- this one is a dog. If you've never seen it yous've made excellent life choices and I salute your splendid judgement.
40 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fun, but stupid
After all seeing the very funny motion picture Caddyshack, I was looking forward to seeing the sequel, but I have to admit that I was nervous considering I heard a lot of bad things about Caddyshack 2. I was too reading on the net how this was voted 1 of the worst sequels of all time, which is distressing. Only I wanted to see the movie nonetheless, just at least see if it was really that bad. So I rented it anyways and watched it the other night. At present, I hold, this movie is really stupid, simply it's a funny stupid that's very low-cal hearted and has a few really good laughs. I know Randy Quaid can be annoying at times, simply he really steals the evidence and his comedy is outrageous. I didn't like how they were trying to supersede certain characters from the start pic, simply I let go and concluded upward laughing and having fun with Caddyshack two.
Jack Hartounian is what you might call, "New Money", but he's a very successful in structure and is worth millions. He's a chip out in that location, personality wise, and dresses a bit crazy, but knows the hard work of the mutual man. His daughter, Katie, begs him to join a golf club and then she could exist with the upper class elite. Just he makes a fool of himself and wants revenge on those who made fun of him. He buys the club and turns it into an entertainment park! But this doesn't stop the elite from trying to tear him downwards.
Caddyshack 2 is stupid at times, similar the gofer, they took the joke a fiddling far. And Dan Aykrod'due south graphic symbol, I dearest Dan and then much, merely information technology's like he took on Nib Murray'southward character from the first Caddyshack and fabricated Dan really annoying. Jackie Mason is a bit out there and tin can't stand up to Rodney Dangerfield. Just Caddyshack ii however has a few adept laughs, I mean, if you couldn't laugh at Randy Quaid and how he delivered his lines, check your funny bones. Caddyshack two is a silly pic, but it's all in good fun, only if we are merely going to keep comparing to the offset picture, and then yous're not going to take a practiced time.
5/10
10 out of 12 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pretty Lame...
The almost-archetype first film is actually a nifty comedy, whereas, this one recycles some of the jokes, and doesn't practise nearly as well. At that place was a magic about the first film where everything merely worked, whereas this time effectually, naught worked and for the about function was rather unfunny. Picket the first 10-xx minutes for the return of Ty Webb, and then go about your concern...
eleven out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The old, funny, classic shack, isn't back
Hither'due south another instance of a sequel that falls into "the too late, and why carp category". Information technology has one asset: Jackie Bricklayer. He's a classic, and rightfully likable guy, where Bushwood won't accept him, so he retaliates and that he does with personal malice, by planning to knock information technology down and put upwardly an amusement park. All the magic to the original Caddyshack has gone, save for a couple of original stars, including that notorious gopher who nosotros see more of, in this. Chevy Chase chatting upwardly some hotties, uses some rude, tasteless lines that kind of mirrors how this quality whole pic comes beyond. Dan Ackroyd, donning a existent high squealy voice, comes across every bit really annoying, a pain in the butt, which is where he gets shot with an poison pointer. Watching Weekend At Bernie's Jonathan Silverman at the showtime, getting used, by a snotty heartlss bi..h, that has him running many yards to fetch her a soft drink, made me thirsty, which had me thinking later, this scene was pointless and unfunny, although I'll always think it. Mason and some hotties are actually the only things, this movie has going for it, oh, and that gopher. Off past many tees.
5 out of six found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
watch this pic
Watch this film .....only to truly capeesh how skillful the original is. I'k not real hard to delight, only this was 1 of the worst movies I accept ever seen.
Information technology hurt me deeply, considering I similar Chevy Chase, Jackie Mason, and Dyan Cannon. The writing was simply terrible! I thought Chevy would have at least advert libbed some amend stuff than he did. There was hardly anything to express mirth at in this movie. I went into it wanting to relish it. I wanted to laugh but about cried.
In the get-go credits it read Special Advent by Chevy Hunt. This worried me from the start. Chevy is actually in more than than I idea he would exist. It's more than a "special appearance". Besides bad the appearance wasn't special. Mason'southward character would accept been a good secondary grapheme but got old every bit a master. I would rather have seen more (much more)of Dyan Cannon. At to the lowest degree her character was fun, if not well written. I likewise missed the gratuatis teen sex scene. Mr. Gopher went from being beautiful and innocent to a pesky rodent that deserved to be blown up. Jonathan Silverman is the only character that interested me and nosotros didn't encounter enough of him.
I accept it back. Try..to watch half of this pic, then...remember the Alamo, the Maine, and CaddyShack I.
20 out of 24 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This 1 isn't near as good equally the first, but it isn't one of the worst movies e'er.
While this ane certainly is not the original, information technology certainly isn't bad enough to be on the listing of worst movies always. I found some of the jokes to exist funny and information technology wasn't a consummate waste material of time so I just don't run into how information technology has such a depression ranking. Well maybe I do. The primary problems I had with this one are the story and its focus. This movie really has cypher to do with caddies, other than Silverman'due south graphic symbol there are no other caddies that are focused on. In fact, other than the fact information technology is a state social club, Chevy'due south character is back, and the gopher information technology really doesn't have much else in common with the original. Jackie Mason is the focal signal here taking the Rodney Dangerfield part from the first. Here is ane of the problems; he isn't nigh as funny or likable every bit Dangerfield. The scenes with his daughter also become annoying as it gets somewhat serious at times. Chevy reprises his role as Ty, but other than the fact he goes "nananana" he virtually is a different character. Dan Akroyd sort of takes the place of Bill Murray'southward character and has a few funny lines, merely his performance will not make anyone forget Bill Murray from the first one. As well, y'all practice not have special appearances in a movie, when that appears it just makes your whole film seem a bit generic. Also, both Chevy and Dan were in the movie more than say Marsha Warfield who is listed ahead of them. There are some proficient performances though...I liked Randy Quaid'due south graphic symbol and Robert Stack was rather skilful too. It is good for a couple of laughs and I do not really remember it is all that awful, only if only they could take done a better chore with the central story in this one. I just don't think Jackie was very adept and he kind of pulls the movie downwards a couple of notches.
15 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Worst. Sequel. Ever.
It's 8 years later the mega-hit "Caddyshack," and the studio wants to milk that cash cow again, but it all went horribly, horribly wrong. They couldn't get Rodney Dangerfield, and so they went with the third-string facsimile, Jackie Mason. Ted Knight? No, Robert Stack. Bill Murray? No, a bizarre and whiny Dan Ackroyd, in what has to be the worst functioning of his career. I approximate Chevy Chase's telephone wasn't ringing off the claw, since he reprises his role as Ty Webb.
And it all went downhill from there. Where else could information technology go? Randy Quaid is only awful (surprise!) as is Dyan Cannon, Jonathan Silverman and Dina Merrill. The script could have been written by a high school drama class (and probably was), the management is tepid and unfocused, and the whole thing is a limp and deadly mess.
Salvage your time and money and brain cells. It was like watching a car wreck--you want to avoid your gaze, but y'all just can't believe what you are seeing. The worst sequel of all fourth dimension. Ever, ever, ever.
fourteen out of 18 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
unnecessary...VERY unnecessary
I saw "Caddyshack Ii" when I was ten and I mostly laughed considering of the equus caballus scene. I should have realized that the flick was every bit empty equally...I can't come up with a practiced comparison. It'south stupid and non fifty-fifty really funny. The cast members from the original who chose non to star in this fabricated probably the best choices that they ever made in rejecting this; why, oh why, did Chevy Chase render?! And how on globe did Jackie Bricklayer, Robert Stack, Dyan Cannon and Dan Aykroyd get involved in this swill?! I bet that every person who had his/her name even remotely attached to this junk (eastward.g., the caterer) is ashamed across redemption. So, all in all, information technology's across dreadful, terrible, and everything such. Avoid information technology similar yous would the Ebola virus.
4 out of 7 institute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not as good as the commencement
I liked the original Caddyshack, so thought I'd requite this ane a go. I agree with oher reviews, its not equally funny as the original. There is the same character every bit before, someone that is hated past everyone in the club, that is richer than all of them. Same as before, why repeat the same storyline? The caddy in this version isn't even the main function, similar the first. The only thing that made it for me, funny wise, was Chevy Hunt, and peradventure the sale bit...
2 out of 2 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
no
A while agone I attempted to sit through the entire Caddyshack ballsy back-to-back, but part Ii took me 3 sittings. I toughed information technology out though. I'm not a quitter.
What happened here? What somehow made the original a archetype lies with the filmmakers' decision to toss the script more-or-less and rely on the improvisational genius of the veteran comics. Here, the viewer is dragged though a lifeless, by-the-numbers 80s light comedy PLOT and left feeling hurt and dislocated and certainly not filled with mirth. Oh sure, y'all've got the talents of Jonathan Silverman AND Marsha Warfield (I keep waiting for some frontwards thinking, cutting edge network to bring back her talk show) vying for your attentions IN THE Same Picture! And you get to see Jackie Stonemason in a atomic number 82 role! That'southward not enough? Well, the two returning characters, Chevy Hunt's Ty Webb and the gopher certainly pull their weight. Chase has no shame and everybody knows it. Robert Stack could brand Hooked On Phonics sound like Crime and Penalisation, so there's no fault in that location. Quaid and Akyroid are abrasive every bit ever....
Oh, I idea of something good! The Kenny Loggins theme vocal is fantastic! Far superior to his contribution to the original Caddyshack. Whenever I face a challenge in life, I am heartened past thinking of this inspirational song. "I'm goin' all the way"! I was pleased to see that it appears on a 2 disc best of Kenny Loggins. Good phone call.
10 out of 13 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Plebeian manners
Rich contractor Jackie Mason has at the urging of his daughter Jessica Lundy gone to mix with the establishment at a posh state club. Her best friend is Chyna Phillips who is the spoiled rotten daughter of club president Robert Stack and Dina Merrill. She also has a blood brother Brian McNamara who is equally spoiled and interested in Lundy.
And then Mason goes at that place and truly does not fit. What does he do but start a social revolution of sorts as was done in the original Caddyshack.
Simply Chevy Chase and the gopher return from the original bandage. The chemistry in the cast of the original is missing. Caddyshack 2 is not the classic depression forehead comedy that the original was.
Some funny stuff is nowadays though. I liked the encephalon dead Dan Aykroyd and his boxing of wits with the elusive gopher. Gauge who comes out on top?
Definitely 2d charge per unit. Like a road company production of the original Caddyshack.
1 out of ane found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A hard watch
Warning: Spoilers
Information technology took eight years for a sequel to Caddyshack to get made, mayhap the greatest "hijinks ensue" movie ever fabricated. I say that phrase considering it'due south such a elementary concept: a quick statement like "A mean solar day in the life of a golf grade...and hijinks ensue."
The beauty of the original flick is that despite the out there characters like Chevy Chase'southward Ty Webb and Rodney Dangerfield'southward Al Czervik, the story is really near the struggles of Danny Noonan (Michael O'Keefe), a working-form child forced to follow the whims of the incredibly rich in the hopes that he can piece of work toward a better life. It also comes from actual life, every bit writer Brian Doyle-Murray, his brothers Bill and John, likewise -- was a caddie at Indian Hill Club in Winnetka, Illinois. His brothers Bill and John Murray, and director Harold Ramis had all been in Danny's caddy shoes at 1 point. Near of the people in the motion-picture show were all based on bodily members of the clubs that they had worked at.
Ramis told the A. V. Society that he went in with the right intentions: "They said, "Hey, nosotros've got a bully idea: The Shack is Back! And I said, "No, I don't think so." Simply they said that Rodney really wanted to exercise information technology, and we could build it effectually Rodney. Rodney said, "Come up on, practice information technology." Then the classic statement came up which says that if you don't practise it, someone volition, and it volition be really bad. And then I worked on a script with my partner Peter Torokvei, consulting with Rodney all the fourth dimension. And then Rodney got into a fight with the studio and backed out. We had some success with Back to Schoolhouse, which I produced and wrote, and we were working with the same director, Alan Metter. When Rodney pulled out, I pulled out, and and then they fired Alan and got someone else. I got a call from co-producer Jon Peters proverb, "Come up with us to New York; nosotros're going to encounter Jackie Stonemason!" I said, "Ooh, don't do this. Why don't nosotros let information technology dice?" And he said, "No, information technology'll be great." But I didn't go, and they got other writers to finish it. I tried to take my proper name off that one, but they said if I took my name off, it would come out in the trades and I would hurt the moving-picture show."
This moment of wondering why this picture is being made and feeling is that information technology's the wrong thought? That will come throughout the word of this flick.
So instead of Rodney, we become Jackie Mason. Sure, they're both older Jewish comedians who married much younger women tardily in their lives, merely that's about all they have in common. Rodney'due south character was an everyman who seemed to exist using the audience every bit his therapist, bemoaning the way he was treated with lines like "I know I'grand ugly. I said to a bartender, "Brand me a zombie.' He told me that God beat him to it." To me, Mason e'er felt like he was lecturing the audience, somewhat above information technology*.
Dan Aykroyd is 1 of my favorite actors, merely he'south basically coming on to be Neb Murray. And while Jonathan Silverman and Michael O'Keefe are somewhat interchangeable, in that location's a big separate between Robert Stack and Ted Knight. And that's no slight to whatsoever of these actors, only when y'all're placed in the aforementioned exact role as a moving-picture show that is beloved, you're going to get compared. After all, Ted Knight is my favorite villain in any movie. He'southward perfect in his function. And while I love Robert Stack, I can just encounter him in heroic roles or parts that brand fun of his heroic nature.
I hateful, I dearest Randy Quaid, just his role was written for Sam Kinison, who would take destroyed audiences with that part.
To exist fair, Dangerfield was to be in this, simply a calendar month before production, he bailed, realizing that it wouldn't work. He kept adding to his contract, demanding terminal cut and royalties and getting everything he wanted, except to be released from the picture. This all ended up with him facing a $10 1000000 dollar lawsuit.
But in that location however needed to be a movie.
Equally for director Allan Arkush, he told Sports Illustrated "I should have never fabricated this picture! What was I thinking?" He told the states -- in an interview we were honored to go to deport -- "Yous should never make a movie for the incorrect reasons. You should just make movies about something where y'all know no ane else can make information technology better than y'all."
Then what's it all about, you may ask.
Kate Hartounian (Jessica Lundy, who was in Bright Lights, Big City and Vampire's Osculation the same year this was released), the girl of real estate developer and working human being Jack (Mason), seeks to improve her social status by following the advice of her friend Miffy Immature (Chynna Phillips) and asks her dad to join the Bushwood Country Order.
Of course, seeing as how her dad builds housing that normal people tin can beget, he doesn't fit in with gild members like Chandler Young (Stack), his wife Cynthia (Dina Merrill, Operation Petticoat) and Mr. Jamison (an e'er welcome Paul Bartel).
Certain, hijinks ensue, merely information technology's hard to get behind the blustering Stonemason, who strangely attracts Diane Cannon, making this into something of a science fiction motion picture. The gopher tin can now talk (someone become Frank Welker in the booth stat!) and Chevy Chase shows up for all of five minutes, near of which consists of him being a sexist boor to scare off multiple women in a scene that may have seemed funny in 1988 but seems across gross in 2021 (I know, I know -- let's non place our modern values on movies from the past; I'1000 likewise the guy who brings y'all all sorts of aberrant Italian and Spanish gut-churning filth, right?!? But mayhap I just concord with the "medium talent" assessment of Chase).
The hardest thing to deal with in this movie that it'southward made by incredibly talented people placed into a thankless struggle to make something halfway decent. I mean, Harold Ramis and PJ Torokvei (who wrote Armed and Dangerous, Back to School, WKRP in Cincinnati and Real Genius) wrote the script with rewrites by Jeffrey Price and Peter Seaman, who wrote Who Framed Roger Rabbit together**.
The thing that really sticks out to me is that Caddyshack works whether or not you lot play golf, simply if yous love the game, you can come across the nuances and enjoyment of the sport within the movie. In the sequel, golf game just seems to be something in the groundwork, other than the miniature golf class finale that closes the motion picture.
I estimate yous should add the phrase, "Don't remake Caddyshack" to other important lessons similar "Never fight a land war in Asia" and "Never go confronting a Sicilian when death is on the line."
In our same chat with the managing director, this movie was summed upwardly quite simply:
B&S: And then why Caddyshack II?
ALLAN: Yeah, exactly. Why Caddyshack Two? There are no more than questions to be answered.
*Indeed, Arkush said --later on seeing Mason perform ii nights in a row -- "I started to get a very different impression of him. The thing that occurred to me was that he didn't connect with the audition in any sort of personal way. That'southward not necessarily a good affair for someone who'southward supposed to exist your lead. At least when Rodney says, "I become no respect," there's an empathy that he evokes from the audition."
**To be fair, they also wrote Wild Wild West and How the Grinch Stole Christmas, so perhaps...
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Does what it sets out to practice. Creats laughing. :)
ahh, digging in the $5 dvd bin. come up upwards with this controversial doozy. Even so remember being about xiii looking forwards to this moving picture. Having never totally understanding moving picture at the time, I loved information technology. Today 2004... I still like it. Provides a decent express mirth. Sure, it probably doesn't deserve the name that it'south nether... but neither did the Italian Job. (which I prefer to phone call The American Job. ) But hey, yous just don't become into this pic expecting the first motion picture. If you did, y'all'll be crying for decades. Fortunately, I see the movie for what it was. More of a parody of the original. Cypher can beat the original. Caddyshack II doesn't bother to try. And I love that for it. :)
5/10
Quality: 0/10 Amusement: ix/x Replayable: 10/10
v out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The astonishing thing well-nigh this one is that SOMEONE really thought it was a expert idea and would brand coin!!!
Accept you lot always heard the former expression "you tin never go dorsum"? Well, regardless, the maxim definitely holds true when it comes to "Caddyshack 2"...a film that fails in every way to capture the magic (such as information technology was) in "Caddyshack". Role of the trouble is that this sequel came out eight years later....the other part is that almost no one from the original moving-picture show is in this 1. The sole person playing the same part is Chevy Chase...and he was the worst part of the original film!
In this story, a young girl from apprehensive roots has inexplicably made friends with a cold and nasty spoiled brat. The deviling's father runs a countryclub then the girl'southward family is invitied to visit the place. However, the Hartounians are anything but the types for countryclubs and Jack Hartounian (Jackie Mason) before long ends up making a mess of everything with his low-form means. All this results in neat embarrassment for the Hartounian daughter who wants to fit in with the nasty rich jerks that are members of the identify. And, information technology results in the gild members not only giving Jack Hartounian the common cold shoulder just trying to destroy his business...out of spite. And, naturally, Hartounian returns the favor!
Because of the dearth of original actors who reprised their roles, the filmmakers made a very bad decision. While the cute groundhog was i of the best things almost the original pic, here in the sequel they drag its office significantly....which is NOT a corking idea when you're talking well-nigh a puppet! Now, the puppet can really talk (a fleck) and its antics are no longer cute simply boorish and stupid. Add together to that lots of farting, a equus caballus that laughs. the almost idiotic golfing scenes in history likewise as joke after joke after joke that autumn completely apartment considering they aren't funny, and you lot've got a film that is a chore to picket.
I would accept to hold with comments like "information technology'due south the worst sequel e'er"....as I tin can't call back of a worse one off the top of my head. However, it has a few tiny laughs here and there so it manages to eke out a 2...inappreciably a glowing endorsement for this mess! Information technology's inept on every level...and particularly where it counts...with the god-atrocious writing. As for the acting, it isn't good...but Dan Akryoyd is simply god-awful....worse than he was in "Dr. Detroit" or "Neighbors" or even "Cipher Only Trouble"!
4 out of x found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Awful! Just awful!
This film should never have been fabricated! It stinks, it's awful, it's no adept, it's bad, it's terrible. Starting to see a blueprint here? Jackie Mason is certainly no Rodney Dangerfield. Gone were Ted Knight and Bill Murray, who, along with Dangerfield, were essential to the first pic. Information technology seems that the three of them (the stars) all knew a stinker of a script when they saw one. The one who didn't take the good sense to bow out of this was Chevy Chase, who stuck around just was extraneous to both films in my opinion. This film is quite only NOT FUNNY. Nor does information technology have any other endearing qualities. This thing relies heavily on anti-Semitism to piece of work and information technology works to it's detriment. I hated this thing. A waste of everybody's time.
2 out of 3 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Vivid Crappy Film
Alarm: Spoilers
Ok this is No Oscar Winner BUT it Nonetheless made me Express joy why? Because it was so STUPID i simply couldn't assistance not to Laugh at all the Really Stupid Jokes and Such. The Bandage was rediculice they all pretty much knew they were only making a Crappy Film and had a expert fourth dimension making it. Randy Quaid as the Lawyer was very Funny. The main Rich Male parent was also Hilarious. He was but in similar xx Films all together. Of course the put in the clumpsys Rich Smart Golfer Man. That was in the Other 2 films. I am and then BAD with name's I can't call back his real name. Merely he is in Tons of Film'due south. Oh Chevy Chase Lol 🤣 that is slap-up putting him in the Picture.
2 out of three constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Better than you retrieve
Look nada is e'er going to bear on the original movie. Yet this sequel is funny and has some good performances as well. I will admit the character of jack isn't the best merely I've seen worse. The Gopher is funny and the soundtrack led by Kenny Loggins is swell. So judge for yourself and requite information technology a look.
Tim Treakle.
two out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Shack Own't Dorsum!
A truly horrible sequel that shows some of the cast from the first film cruising through an awful script. Bill Murray has left, leaving Dan Akyroyd to chase the gofer around. No hilarity ensues.
Rumors have recently arisen of a new "Caddyshack" film. I just hope they don't make information technology as bad equally this.
one/5 stars -
John Ulmer
ii out of 4 plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Information technology At Least Lives Upward to Its Reputation
Caddyshack II (1988)
BOMB (out of 4)
One might see CADDYSHACK 2 and right off the bat thinks it'south just a cheap, slice of trash thrown together quickly to cash-in on the success of the first motion-picture show. I mean, this hither is often what happens when you accept a hit film but that's not exactly the case here because this came eight years later the original and so they certainly had fourth dimension to come upward with something better. You tin can read the diverse product problems elsewhere and you can also read the plot summery elsewhere. No matter what you read or run into, CADDYSHACK II is without question a horrid film that lives up to its reputation as one of the worst sequels ever made. Chevy Chase is the only person back and and so we have Jackie Stonemason, Robert Stack, Dyan Cannon, Randy Quaid and Dan Aykroyd basically playing rip-off characters of what were seen in the original. Again, it'south clear that this here was a horrible idea correct from the offset equally the cast and writers take freely admitted this. It'due south notwithstanding shocking to retrieve that the studio wanted something like this but I estimate they thought it would exist easy greenbacks. The unabridged screenplay is just then unfunny that you can't help but wonder why anyone signed onto it. The entire finale dealing with a competition runs way too long and it takes forever to become where information technology's going. There'south really nothing working in this picture, although there might accept been i or two small smiles throughout the entire running time. The cast are just annoying and you know y'all're in trouble when a simulated gopher gives the all-time functioning.
2 out of 5 constitute this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
They never should take bothered
What were they thinking! The original Caddyshack was bright and should be considered a archetype. Everything worked even though it shouldn't. I nonetheless quote lines from it 25+ years later.
The bandage of the original was superb. For Caddyshack II however none of them seem right. There is no chemistry at all. All the jokes fail badly. I just felt sorry for both Stonemason and Akroyd (maybe they realized that they missed out on a fantastic picture show the offset time and were trying to make up for it) I by and large will sit down through just almost annihilation I've paid $3 to rent but later 20 minutes I couldn't handle any more than. Its THAT bad.
v out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mediocre
Caddyshack Two is a proficient pic by itself simply compared to the original it cant stack up. Robert Stack is a horrible replacement for Ted Knight and Jackie Stonemason, while funny simply cant compete with Rodney Dangerfield. Ty Webb is funny, being the only grapheme from the original. Most of the other characters in the moving-picture show lack the punch of the original (Henry Wilcoxon for case) except for the hystericly funny lawyer Peter Blunt, being played by Randy Quaid. Every line he says reminds me of the originals humor, especially the scene at his part (I don't go in for police suits or motions. I find out where you alive and come to your firm and beat downwardly your door with a f***ing baseball bat, make a bonfire with the chippindale,maybe roast that aureate retriever (arff arff arff) then eat information technology. And so I'thousand comin' upstairs inferior, and I'm grabbing you by your brooks brothers pjs, and cramming your brand new BMW upward your tight a**! Do we have an agreement?). Offsetting his pocket-sized role nevertheless, is Dan Acroyd, who is apparently no replacement for Bill Murray. His vocalisation is across irritating and everything he does isnt even funny, its just stupid. Overall Caddyshack II is a good movie, merely in comparison to the awesome original it but cant cut it.
7 out of 12 establish this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pigsty in one
I similar the chip where he hit the brawl really hard and got a pigsty in one on a par 4
2 out of five plant this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A far cry from the first Caddyshack...
Why is this one no good when the first one rocked? Try the fact that they attempted to supervene upon Rodney Dangerfield with Jackie Mason! Please! That's like replacing the Beatles with Wierd Al. Randy Quaid is the just one that saves this movie from a cipher.
However, don't allow this finish you lot from watching the start motion-picture show which was outstanding.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Non completely horrible but...
Only Chevy Hunt and the gopher are back. The Bushwood country society are getting new electric golf carts and the caddies won't be needed anymore. Jack Hartounian (Jackie Mason) is the inappropriate construction boss with a golfing daughter Kate (Jessica Lundy). He doesn't fit in with the snobby loftier form members specially since some of them from the historical society want to stop his low income apartment building. The only truthful friends may be Ty Webb (Chevy Chase) and caddy Harry (Jonathan Silverman).
Rodney Dangerfield doesn't come up back and they replace him with Jackie Mason. I respect his old school comedic style. He manages to put some of those jokes in hither. I find it endearing at get-go. Chevy Chase is back but he's merely a supporting histrion anyways. This is Jackie Mason's pic. I don't fifty-fifty know why the gopher is back. It's really just a mascot without Bill Murray. The movie isn't as horrible as ane may expect, but the lost of so much comedic ability could never be truly replaced. Dan Aykroyd is probably the only one of the new cast who actually gets this sense of sense of humour ostensibly to accept over Bill Murray's comedic spirit. One must judge this without the Caddyshack proper name. Even then, this is a bland comedy.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Source: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094824/reviews
0 Response to "Love Lied to Me Again Sam Kinison I Wouldnt Lie to You Ten Times in a Row"
Postar um comentário